Significant determinants of legal arguments: subjectivism, irrationalism, volunteer liberalism

Extracting Legal Arguments from Forensic Bayesian Networks

Recent developments in the forensic sciences have confronted the field of legal reasoning with the new challenge of reasoning under uncertainty. Forensic results come with uncertainty and are described in terms of likelihood ratios and random match probabilities. The legal field is unfamiliar with numerical valuations of evidence, which has led to confusion and in some cases to serious miscarri...

A General Structure for Legal Arguments

A Bayesian network (BN) is a graphical model of uncertainty that is especially well-suited to legal arguments. It enables us to visualise and model dependencies between different hypotheses and pieces of evidence and to calculate the revised probability beliefs about all uncertain factors when any piece of new evidence is presented. Although BNs have been widely discussed and recently used in t...

The new irrationalism in weaning.

Community Determinants of Volunteer Participation: The Case of Japan

Follow this and additional works at: http://wesscholar.wesleyan.edu/div2facpubs Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Asian Studies Commons, Community Engagement Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, Health Policy Commons, Law and Society Commons, Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Public Administration Commons, Public Policy Commons, Social Policy Commons...

Legal Determinants of the Return on Equity

Recent work documents that better legal institutions are associated with broader equity markets. We investigate whether differences in legal institutions also help explain the international cross-section of expected stock returns. Three main regularities emerge. First, total stock market returns are positively correlated with overall measures of the quality of institutions, such as judicial eff...